• Skip to main content
  • HOME
  • ABOUT
    • STANCE
    • RADIO
    • TERMS and CONDITIONS
  • CULTURE
    • TRUE STORY
    • MUSIC
    • FEATURES
  • STORE
    • PRODUCTS
    • INFO
    • FAQS
  • CONTACT
    • GENERAL INQUIRIES
    • CUSTOMER SERVICE

After 9-11 and Where We Are

Twitter Instagram
New Pausetape Header Banner_7-21-A1

After 9-11 and Where We Are

banner_j. sailer

Did the events of September 11, 2001 change U.S. freedom in a way that can not be regained? (photo/ J. Sailer)

By Official Pausetape Staff

July 21, 2021.

Updated January 7, 2025.

The World Trade Center attack took place in New York City  on September 11, 2001.The USA never had a credible explanation justifying the invasion of Iraq on March 19, 2003.  Mainstream media was slow to emphasize the lack of justification for the Iraq invasion.  Today, the international press is more open to discussing the mistake, and the damage caused by those actions. 

With each passing day, government insiders increasingly speak out about the legal disregard  that the War in Iraq represented. A November 20th, 2003 article  in The Guardian titled,  War Critics Astonished as US Hawk Admits Invasion was Illegal, by  Oliver Burkeman and Julian Borger explained  why  the invasion of Iraq was illegal. Burkeman and Borger stated how, “International lawyers and anti-war campaigners reacted with astonishment yesterday after the influential Pentagon hawk Richard Perle conceded that the invasion of Iraq had been illegal.” Astonishment may have finally been expressed, while at the common level, the public knew that the invasion of Iraq was unjustified from the very beginning. Everyone knew.  

The international community spoke against the US invasion of Iraq, but a different agenda had already been set in motion. Burkeman and Borger went on to say, “… Mr. Perle, a key member of the defence policy board, which advises the US defence secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, said that “international law … would have required us to leave Saddam Hussein alone,” and this would have been morally unacceptable.” The Iraq invasion destroyed U.S. credibility in the eyes of the international community, and that credibility has never been restored.  Mainstream journalists seldom pressed the Bush Administration about the Iraq invasion. At the time, no criticism was allowed, and the whole world saw what the U.S. had openly become.

The Mirror, in a July 10th, 2016 Op-Ed piece titled, John Prescott reveals his guilt at the ‘illegal’ Iraq War will haunt him for the rest of his life, voiced the same level of regret that U.S. Defense Secretary Robert McNamara voiced in stating that the Vietnam War was a mistake. Similarly, John Prescott explained how, “As the Deputy Prime Minister in that Government I must express my fullest apology, especially to the families of the 179 men and women who gave their lives in the Iraq War.” Hindsight paints a different picture, but there was something else to consider. High level decision-makers hae a different point of view about  what is allowed to happen in wars where soldiers are draftees, as opposed to when the soldiers are enlisted personnel. There is an unspoken sentiment which says that enlisted soldiers are responsible for whatever happens to  them during their military experience because they volunteered for it.   

When the U.S. decided to invade Iraq, the international community refuted their evidence that was being used to justify a  military attack. In a September 16th, 2004 BBC News story titled, Iraq War, illegal, says Annan,  the late United Nations Secretary General  said, ” … the decision to take action in Iraq should have been made by the Security Council, not unilaterally.”  The invasion of Iraq was an unfortunate situation, because revenge seemed to be the motive.  The U.S. press got part of the plan right, in questioning the validity of the reports which said Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.  Those accusations held no factual evidence and the military intelligence community knew exactly which weapons Iraq possessed.

John Prescott went on to say that, “These reports were based on discussions at receptions and prejudiced sources.  As I told the Iraq Inquiry, the ­intelligence seemed to be tittle-tattle, not hard evidence. We now learn from Chilcot that even the intelligence agencies warned of the inadequacies or reliability of such intelligence sources.”   The way that Iraq was invaded changed U.S. society from that point forward. Fear fueled the rise of the U.S. Surveillance State. The creation of The USA Patriot Act of 2001 ( and the section 215 extension via The USA Freedom Act of 2015), the Homeland Security Act of 2002, and the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012 were all byproducts of the illegal invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Back To Top

About

  • Stance
  • Radio
  • Terms and Conditions

Culture

  • True Story
  • Music
  • Features

Store

  • Products
  • Info
  • FAQs

Contact

  • General Inquiries
  • Customer Service
Twitter Instagram

©Official Pausetape.  All Rights Reserved.

Copyright © 2025 fourfivefunk.com
This website uses cookies to improve your experience. We'll assume you're ok with this, but you can opt-out if you wish. Cookie settingsACCEPT
Privacy & Cookies Policy

Privacy Overview

This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these cookies, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may have an effect on your browsing experience.
Necessary
Always Enabled
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. This category only includes cookies that ensures basic functionalities and security features of the website. These cookies do not store any personal information.
Non-necessary
Any cookies that may not be particularly necessary for the website to function and is used specifically to collect user personal data via analytics, ads, other embedded contents are termed as non-necessary cookies. It is mandatory to procure user consent prior to running these cookies on your website.
SAVE & ACCEPT